Showing posts with label The News Record. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The News Record. Show all posts

Sunday, April 5, 2009

I have seen the future of newspapers ...

Okay, so this weekend I went to the Region 4 Society of Professional Journalists Conference in Columbus, OH. (My paper, The News Record, won second place, all-around best non-daily college paper, btw; make sure you check it out here http://www.newsrecord.org/ if you haven't already.) Obviously, there were tons of newspaper people there and talk of the future of newspapers was the constant buzz.

Now, lots of people have lots of ideas. Some think print newspapers will be extinct within 10 years. Some think the government should bail out the industry. Some are working furiously to find just the right formula to satiate both readers and advertisers. But aside from cutting sections or shifting focus, aside from changing formats or emphasizing interactivity, aside from pie-in-the sky (or are they?) print-at-home concepts, not much has changed as far as innovation goes.

But then the managing editor of The Detroit News, Walter Middlebrook, spoke about the changes his paper, along with joint operating agreement partner The Detroit Free Press had just implemented earlier in the week.

You see, those two papers made significant changes to their subscription delivery program by reducing home delivery to just three days a week (I think The Detroit News is delivering, if I remember correctly, on Thursdays, Fridays and Saturdays; it is a six-day-a-week publication). The two are the first major metro papers to make such a move.

David Hunke, publisher of the Free Press and CEO of the Detroit Media Partnership, told CNN in December 2008 that the action was in response to the ailing economy and the changing tastes of tech-savvy consumers. He expected the newspapers would face about a 9 percent reduction in their workforces under the plan, but stressed that no layoffs were planned for newsroom staffs.

Basically, readers of these two dailies will have four options on non-delivery days:
  • Skip the day's newspaper
  • Buy a copy off newsstands
  • Get news from the papers' free Web sites
  • Or, perhaps most intriguingly, subscribe to the e-edition

The e-edition is the new (ish?) wrinkle in all of this. Guaranteed to be in your email box no later than 5:30 a.m., the e-edition is your daily paper in electronic form. It is an assemblance of click and drag PDFs. You can turn the pages using your mouse, and if you want to zoom in and read a particular article, you just roll over it. It is like the very pages my staff and I prepare three nights a week. But instead of sending them to press, they are posted directly online, utilizing a few more bells and whistles intended to improve readability and, presumably, online experience.

As I said, this just launched last week. It's much too early to judge success or failure, but it is fascinating. Will this quell those who can't stand the idea of losing the form of the traditional newspaper? How about those who find many newspaper Web sites to be non-navigable or non-intuitive? You still can't take an e-edition into the bathroom with you, and coffee and the newspaper in bed in the morning won't feel quite the same either.

There is one other option Middlebrook said The News is considering. An device known as the Plastic Logic e-Reader is being bandied about as a potential light-weight, portable, electronic delivery method.

The popular Kindle has been mentioned as a possibility by other newspaper publishers, and sure the field will surely only continue to grow.

I think the idea of the essentially all PDF e-edition is one of the better options I've heard. I'm a purist: I like to hold the paper in in my hands and fold it as I see fit. There is a great amount of intimacy in my personal history with newspapers, dating back all those years ago when I traded sections with my dad over the breakfast table. But I'm in the business and being a part of this business is bigger to me than the paper it is printed on.

Newspapers must adapt. And so must their fans.

What do you think? Will you miss all that paper and ink when it's gone? Would you prefer newspaper get a bailout before GM? Are you happy to see them both go the way of the dodo bird? Are you already online only? What feedback do you want to share with the industry? I'd love to know your thoughts on the matter.

Friday, February 6, 2009

I want porn and pizza ...

Photo credit: nwistheone/flickr.com

So, I just cannot take it any longer. I feel I need to address the hypocrites and idiots who have found it necessary to comment on the University of Cincinnati's week of "Sexploration."

The event has garnered considerable media attention, especially from the Cincinnati Enquirer, and I'll admit I found it odd that the paper previewed the event on Sunday, Feb. 1. Here's a link to Cliff Peale's article: http://news.cincinnati.com/article/20090201/NEWS01/902010361.
"Really," I thought at the time. "Is there so little going on in Cincinnati that the Enquirer is now covering benign campus events?"

After all, as a student at a major university, I didn't bat an eye when I first heard about "Sexploration," and I'm fairly certain no I know did either.

But the letters to the Enquirer's editorial page started showing up in print, Archbishop Pilarczyk got involved (http://www.newsrecord.org/sections/news/archbishop_upset_with_sexploration-1.1355050)

and so did Peter Bronson

"How are events such as "Pizza and Porn" and "Got the Hook Up?" any better than inviting a tobacco company to peddle cigarettes and celebrate the glories of a good smoke?" This is just one of the pearls of wisdom Bronson offers in his "Sexploration" blog post.

For the record, I can't think of I time I ever thought Bronson was right.

Sigh.

So let me first address the idiots (that's you and your ilk, Bronson). If any of these people had gone to, researched, or even called someone involved with the "Pizza and Porn" event, they'd realize the event was not dinner and a movie, but rather a public forum, a discourse, an exploration of people's thoughts and perspectives on pornography.

In other words, "Pizza and Porn" was intended to bring people of differing opinions together to encourage critical thinking concerning a difficult and controversial subject.

Gee, I could have sworn that this is what college is for: to teach people to think both critically and for themselves.

As for the hypocrites, well, I'll start with Pilarczyk. Dude, you are just in no way, shape or form in a position to comment on, well just about anything to do with sex.

"I find the 'Sexploration' program ... to be profoundly disturbing," Pilarczyk said in a statement released by the Archdiocese. "The gross disregard of the moral sensibilities of many in the university community is troubling in the extreme."

What's troubling to me is that a representative of a religion that is wholly and completely out of touch with life in the 21st century (Hello, no birth control? Seriously?) is commenting on the sexual mores of today's college students.

What's troubling to me is that a man who has vowed to live his life as a celibate is commenting on the safety of the sex others engage in.

What's troubling to me is that a man of such high position, so ready to publicly denounce the university and it's Wellness Center, could be completely misinformed as to whether or not taxpayer funds paid for the week's events (they didn't).

What's troubling to me is that after all the charges, convictions, admissions, accusations and payoffs surrounding pedophile clergy (including this: http://news.cincinnati.com/article/20090117/NEWS01/901170367/-1/today),
Pilarczyk would so willingly and without thinking out the consequences put himself out there in this way, opening himself up to a potential onslaught of criticism and recrimination, ready to make a fool of himself over what is essentially the decision of two consenting adults to participate in safe sex.

Well played, Archbishop. Well played.

Finally, to many, but not all of (some of the comments are very rational and intelligent), the women who post on momslikeme.com: Are you such old farts that you don't remember your college experience? Are you liars or just phonies? Just wondering, because some of you spout such venom towards Pure Romance. Are you denying you had sex in college? Because I'm not falling for that. Just saying.

Whew, I fell better now.

Agree with me? Think I'm a lunatic? Comment away.